TACSTD2 is the most clinically validated target in this set with FDA-approved ADCs. INVEST with high confidence. Differentiation comes from next-gen combinations, not de novo targeting. The target is settled; the contest is at the asset layer. Per ASCO 2026, Kelun/Merck's sac-TMT (SKB264/MK-2870) reads as current best-in-class on payload, linker and tolerability, ahead of Dato-DXd (Daiichi/AZ) and Trodelvy (Gilead). The play is a superior ADC, not de novo targeting.
How to read this
Two prioritised lists, one bar
Every target is scored against the same prioritisation criteria (scientific rationale, tractability, disease impact, commercial fit and timing) and its developability as an ADC or T-cell engager (0–5 each). We then split the shortlist by maturity, since the two demand different plays.
Best-in-class through a differentiated asset
Clinically validated targets (TROP2, HER2, DLL3, EGFR, Nectin-4, c-MET and peers). The target is settled; value comes from a superior construct, not de novo targeting.
Whitespace, earlier evidence
First-in-class targets with less validation. The ADC/TCE-ready pool here is deliberately small, because novel biology often is not yet antibody-accessible, which is where broader modalities come in (below).
Scope, and where it should widen
This brief is scoped to lung (NSCLC, SCLC) and colorectal, and to ADC and T-cell-engager formats. For several validated targets the value unlock is now next-generation modalities, bispecific ADCs, bispecifics, trispecifics and degrader-antibody conjugates, rather than a naked ADC or engager. Limiting the search to ADC/TCE only understates the opportunity; the modality-assessment layer extends the same scoring to those permutations. Coverage expands continuously as the patent and publication database updates; this run processes the highest-priority signals across all three indications.
Mature / validated list
Validated targets, differentiated by the asset
Ranked by ADC/TCE developability then overall score. For these, the report question is which construct wins, not whether the target is real, so several carry a next-generation-modality note.
SEZ6 is the strongest emerging SCLC target with highest expression, 52-82% ORR in Phase 1, and AbbVie-backed Phase 3 advancement. INVEST driven by compelling clinical data, near-universal expression, and less crowded competitive landscape than B7-H3 or DLL3. Phase 3 OS readout will be pivotal.
Nectin-4 is the most clinically advanced target in this set with an FDA-approved ADC and active NSCLC expansion. Key question is NSCLC expression prevalence and patient selection. Nectin-4 ADCs are in Phase 1 in lung, but the target has not yet delivered outside urothelial cancer; treat NSCLC as unproven.
DLL3 is the most validated target in SCLC with FDA-approved therapy and Phase 3 OS benefit. INVEST verdict reflects exceptional tractability and disease impact, despite late timing for new entrants. New data on combination strategies or resistance mechanisms could further refine positioning.
CD276 is a highly tractable, broadly expressed NSCLC target with an accelerating clinical pipeline and emerging efficacy data. The INVEST verdict reflects strong tractability and timing, though scientific rationale is limited by absent human genetic causality. Phase II/III NSCLC-specific efficacy data would most significantly upgrade the assessment.
ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations are the most clinically validated nomination in this set, with FDA-approved therapy and Phase 3 programmes. Despite being a mutation class rather than a discrete target, the biology maps directly to HER2 and represents a clear INVEST opportunity. Key upcoming inflection: Beamion LUNG-2 Phase 3 readout for zongertinib as first-line therapy. HER2 is the best-known ADC target, but that franchise is in breast; HER2-expressing lung is a small subset. In this crowded space the differentiation now comes from bispecific ADCs, not another naked ADC.
CEACAM5 has the most clinically mature pipeline of the 8 candidates but single-agent efficacy has been disappointing. WATCH for Phase III M9140 readout and novel CAR-T approaches that may change the calculus.
ERBB3 has a validated therapeutic platform (approved ADC) but limited expression in SCLC (~10%). WATCH pending preclinical validation of combination strategies (SMARCA4i + HER3-DXd) and SCLC-specific expression profiling. Transition to INVEST requires demonstration of meaningful ERBB3 expression in a treatable SCLC subpopulation.
EGFR is the gold-standard NSCLC target with the highest possible scientific, tractability, and disease impact scores. INVEST verdict reflects exceptional validation, but commercial and timing scores are constrained by the saturated competitive landscape. New investment is justified only for highly differentiated resistance-specific or novel-modality programs. Input signal flags (Flag_overhype, Flag_low_consensus) are consistent with this saturated but validated profile.
CDH17 is a translationally mature surface antigen with near-universal CRC expression, validated oncogenic mechanism, and a diverse pipeline of therapeutic modalities entering Phase I clinical trials. The key data gap is clinical efficacy proof-of-concept, expected from BI 905711 and CAR-T trial readouts within 12-18 months.
GUCY2C is the most clinically de-risked target in this cohort, with Phase I CAR-T data showing meaningful ORRs in mCRC. INVEST based on clinical signal, lineage-restricted expression, and dual vaccine/therapeutic strategy. Key next data: IM96 dose expansion and universal CAR-T trial results.
MUC16 is tractable with multiple modalities and a validated surface antigen with emerging NSCLC data. Bispecific and ADC programs advancing. Key data gap is NSCLC-specific clinical efficacy.
GPA33 combines near-universal CRC expression with a wide-open competitive landscape and novel modalities (CAR-M, radioimmunotherapy). INVEST based on early-mover advantage and excellent target biology, though very early clinical stage adds risk. SNA028 trial and CAR-M data are the key upcoming milestones.
MET is the strongest INVEST target in this cohort. Recent SCLC-specific data demonstrate therapeutic benefit of MET inhibition in combination with CIT, leveraging an established and well-tolerated drug class. The key next step is a clinical trial of MET inhibitor + CIT in ES-SCLC with HGF/MET biomarker stratification. Value is likely in combination, e.g. the AbbVie MET ADC (telisotuzumab vedotin) plus osimertinib, rather than monotherapy.
Mesothelin is a validated target in other solid tumors with mature therapeutic modalities, but SCLC-specific evidence is minimal. WATCH pending expression profiling studies in SCLC subtypes. Confirmation of meaningful MSLN expression in SCLC would upgrade this to INVEST given existing drug development infrastructure.
Novel / first-in-class list
First-in-class, whitespace targets
From a novelty-weighted run. The ADC/TCE-developable set is small by nature: novel targets are often intracellular or not yet antibody-ready, so the fuller novel opportunity sits with the broader modalities noted above.
CDCP1 is a validated cell-surface tumor antigen with active ADC/CAR-T programs and complete white-space in SCLC. INVEST based on tractability and first-mover potential. Key de-risking data needed: SCLC IHC expression profiling.
p75NTR has plausible neuroendocrine lineage biology for SCLC but no direct evidence. WATCH. IHC/scRNA-seq showing strong p75NTR expression in SCLC specimens would upgrade.
TNFSF12/TWEAK-Fn14 axis is the best-validated novel target in this cohort with multiple 2026 primary research publications. Stromal TWEAK activates cancer cell Fn14 via NF-kB, promoting invasion, migration, and immune evasion. Clinical correlation with tumor size and stage validated in 235 human LUAD specimens. Antibody-tractable via receptor (Fn14). Anti-TWEAK mAb (RG7212) has been tested preclinically. White-space in NSCLC.
Full developable set
Every developable target, per indication
The complete surface-accessible set clearing the ADC-or-TCE fit ≥2 bar, ranked by overall score. Mature/validated targets are tagged; the rest are earlier-stage. This is the full reference behind the two shortlists above.
NSCLC · 26 developable
| # | Target | ADC fit | TCE fit | Lead | Composite | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EGFR mature | ADC | 4.4 · A | INVEST | ||
| 2 | TROP2 mature | ADC | 4 · A | INVEST | ||
| 3 | Nectin-4 mature | ADC | 3.7 · B | INVEST | ||
| 4 | B7-H3 mature | TCE | 3.63 · B | INVEST | ||
| 5 | HER2 mature | ADC | 3.43 · C | INVEST | ||
| 6 | MUC16 mature | ADC | 3.35 · C | INVEST | ||
| 7 | HER3 mature | ADC | 3.25 · C | WATCH | ||
| 8 | LAT1 | ADC | 3.18 · C | WATCH | ||
| 9 | Lymphocyte Antigen 6 Complex Locus E | ADC | 3.1 · C | WATCH | ||
| 10 | CD3E | ADC | 3.05 · C | WATCH | ||
| 11 | EPHA3 | TCE | 2.95 · D | WATCH | ||
| 12 | FOLH1 | ADC | 2.88 · D | WATCH | ||
| 13 | CEACAM5 mature | ADC | 2.53 · D | WATCH | ||
| 14 | Mesothelin mature | ADC | 2.5 · D | WATCH | ||
| 15 | ITGAV | ADC | 2.2 · F | WATCH | ||
| 16 | Endothelin Receptor Type B | ADC | 2.08 · F | WATCH | ||
| 17 | EDNRB | ADC | 2 · F | WATCH | ||
| 18 | NECTIN1 | ADC | 1.88 · F | WATCH | ||
| 19 | SEZ6 mature | ADC | 1.6 · F | PASS | ||
| 20 | CDH17 mature | ADC | 1.42 · F | PASS | ||
| 21 | MIAISH3 | TCE | 1.3 · F | PASS | ||
| 22 | MIA | TCE | 1.3 · F | PASS | ||
| 23 | HRG1 | ADC | 1.2 · F | PASS | ||
| 24 | Fc gamma receptor IIc | TCE | 1.1 · F | PASS | ||
| 25 | GPA33 mature | ADC | 1.1 · F | PASS | ||
| 26 | GUCY2C mature | ADC | 1.1 · F | PASS |
SCLC · 21 developable
| # | Target | ADC fit | TCE fit | Lead | Composite | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEZ6 mature | ADC | 3.95 · B | INVEST | ||
| 2 | MET mature | ADC | 3.85 · B | INVEST | ||
| 3 | B7-H3 mature | ADC | 3.8 · B | INVEST | ||
| 4 | DLL3 mature | TCE | 3.68 · B | INVEST | ||
| 5 | CCK2R | ADC | 3.43 · C | INVEST | ||
| 6 | SEZ6L | ADC | 3.18 · C | INVEST | ||
| 7 | TNFR2 | ADC | 2.93 · D | WATCH | ||
| 8 | HER2 mature | ADC | 2.85 · D | WATCH | ||
| 9 | HER3 mature | ADC | 2.72 · D | WATCH | ||
| 10 | CLDN7 | ADC | 2.68 · D | WATCH | ||
| 11 | Mesothelin mature | ADC | 2.55 · D | WATCH | ||
| 12 | Vitronectin receptor | ADC | 2.53 · D | WATCH | ||
| 13 | Nectin-4 mature | ADC | 2.45 · F | WATCH | ||
| 14 | BST1 | ADC | 2.35 · F | WATCH | ||
| 15 | SLC3A1 | ADC | 1.93 · F | WATCH | ||
| 16 | CDH17 mature | ADC | 1.8 · F | PASS | ||
| 17 | CEACAM5 mature | ADC | 1.8 · F | PASS | ||
| 18 | FAT1 | TCE | 1.48 · F | PASS | ||
| 19 | ITGB1 | ADC | 1.35 · F | PASS | ||
| 20 | FCGR2 | ADC | 1.13 · F | PASS | ||
| 21 | CD14 | ADC | 1.02 · F | PASS |
CRC · 17 developable
| # | Target | ADC fit | TCE fit | Lead | Composite | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CDH17 mature | ADC | 3.93 · B | INVEST | ||
| 2 | FLT1 | ADC | 3.65 · B | INVEST | ||
| 3 | EGFR mature | ADC | 3.65 · B | INVEST | ||
| 4 | GUCY2C mature | ADC | 3.53 · B | INVEST | ||
| 5 | Purinergic Receptor P2Y2 | ADC | 3.43 · C | WATCH | ||
| 6 | GPA33 mature | ADC | 3.18 · C | INVEST | ||
| 7 | Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 11 | ADC | 3.12 · C | WATCH | ||
| 8 | B7-H3 mature | TCE | 3.12 · C | WATCH | ||
| 9 | CEACAM5 mature | TCE | 3.05 · C | WATCH | ||
| 10 | interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 1 | ADC | 3 · C | WATCH | ||
| 11 | Interleukin-23 Receptor | ADC | 2.97 · D | WATCH | ||
| 12 | Interferon Alpha/Beta Receptor Subunit 1 | ADC | 2.88 · D | WATCH | ||
| 13 | IL23R Gene | ADC | 2.78 · D | WATCH | ||
| 14 | HER3 mature | ADC | 2.75 · D | WATCH | ||
| 15 | Mesothelin mature | ADC | 2.45 · F | WATCH | ||
| 16 | ANG Gene | ADC | 1.85 · F | PASS | ||
| 17 | SEZ6L | ADC | 1.25 · F | PASS |
ADC × TCE positioning
Which modality each target favours
Lead-grade targets (fit ≥3) by ADC fit (columns) against T-cell-engager fit (rows). Bottom-right favours ADCs, top-left favours engagers, shaded top-right is dual-modality. Accent chips are TCE-lead; letters mark indication (N/S/C).
Method & sources
How to read this
Targets are scored against five prioritisation criteria (scientific rationale, tractability, disease impact, commercial fit, timing), each 0–5, shown as the profile bars on every card; their weighted mean is the composite and letter grade. ADC and TCE fit are separate 0–5 developability scores. Verdicts are the source's own calls, not recommendations. Lead-modality is whichever of ADC or TCE fit is higher.
- INVEST
- Evidence supports carrying the target into programme selection now.
- WATCH
- Credible, but gated on a specific near-term data point.
- Fit 0–5
- Developability in that antibody format; ≥2 is the report's bar.
- Mature vs novel
- Maturity of clinical validation, not quality; both lists are prioritised.
Source: multi-indication assessment (NSCLC, SCLC, CRC) plus a novelty-weighted run, evidence window 2024-01-01 to 2026-12-31, deduplicated to unique target. Scoped to ADC and T-cell-engager formats.